Subject: Re: [geometry] WKB support (write)
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-29 17:18:52
On 29 November 2013 22:00, Mats Taraldsvik <mats.taraldsvik_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I might need WKB write support soon, and I'm planning to start implementing
> this as soon as I have time. Is there consensus on the interface and/or the
AFAIK, no clear consensus, but my opinion is that we should use iterator-based
as primary interface and stream-based as complementary.
> I guess the detail/endian.hpp is complete, also for writing (using store
> instead of load)?
Yes, this concept is based on the traditional load/store architecture 
If we consider stream of bytes as memory and objects as equivalent of
load - loads value from memory into object
store - stores value from object back into memory
-- Mateusz Åoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net