|
Geometry : |
Subject: Re: [geometry] Boost.Geometry models UDLs
From: Andrew Hundt (athundt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-26 17:47:25
> I proposed to support UDLs because this is the feature from the C++ and we
> should be up-to-date :).
>
I would be wary of jumping to support new features just because they are
there unless the new solution is undeniably better than existing backward
compatible techniques. :-)
In my opinion there isn't such a gap so initializer lists make more sense
to me.
Cheers!
Andrew Hundt
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net