Subject: Re: [geometry] Boost.Geometry models UDLs
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-26 20:09:22
Andrew Hundt wrote:
> I proposed to support UDLs because this is the feature from the
> C++ and we should be up-to-date :).
> I would be wary of jumping to support new features just because they
> are there unless the new solution is undeniably better than existing
> backward compatible techniques. :-)
If it was possible to parse them in compile-time then it would be better ;)
> In my opinion there isn't such a gap so initializer lists make more
> sense to me.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net