Subject: Re: [geometry] Boost.Geometry contribution tutorial
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-24 16:55:51
Barend Gehrels wrote:
> Adam Wulkiewicz wrote On 22-5-2014 13:16:
>> Do we also want to put developers guidelines and/or GitHub tutorial
>> in the docs (which means putting the images somewhere in docs) or
>> should they stay only in the Wiki (which means creating an empty
>> branch 'wiki' and putting the images there)?
>> I'd probably vote for option 2. Plus adding direct links to
>> Guidelines and Contribution Tutorial in the README.
> Yes, I agree. The documentation (Quickbook) is targetted to end users.
> Having direct links is OK. But we don't need them in two places,
> w.r.t. maintenance.
> Can you put one thing more in the Guidelines, in the free function
> please add the concept check with the comment that it should be done
> as early as possible?
> template <typename Point>
> inline int foo(Point const& point)
> // Checking if the geometry type fulfils the concept should be done as early as possible, so in the first entry point
> concept::check<Point const>();
> return dispatch<Point>::apply(point);
And the tutorial is now on Wiki too:
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net