From: Anthony Williams (anthony_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-16 10:44:26
Quoting David Ward <dward_at_[hidden]>:
> I'm using dynamic linking on windows and since upgrading to boost 1.35,
> I'm seeing a new dependency on the boost_date_time shared library.
Yes. The thread library now uses boost.date_time for all the timing
related features including condition waits, sleeps and timed mutex
You might get away without needing the date-time DLL: it depends on
> This isn't a big problem of course, but its nice to be able to ship as
> few dlls as necessary and we've never had to ship boost_date_time
> before. Is this something that could be addressed in future versions?
I'll talk to Jeff and see if we can arrange a header-only subset of
boost.datetime which won't force the DLL to be linked.
-- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL