|
Threads-Devel : |
From: Anthony Williams (anthony_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-20 03:55:30
Quoting Anteru <newsgroups_at_[hidden]>:
> I hope this does not appear twice, seems Gmane ate my first message to
> this list.
It did appear twice: it just got held up in the moderation queue, as
I've been away for a few days.
> Well, I still have problems with the conditions, even with the latest
> SVN.
Yes, the win32 spurious-wake-prevention code is faulty. The one-line
fix I originally suggested is better in that it does actually work, at
the expense of more spurious wakes.
I'm working on a new spurious-wake-prevention mechanism. I'm really
frustrated that this hasn't come to light until now.
Anthony
-- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL