Boost logo

Ublas :

Subject: [ublas] [bindings] const-correctness
From: Uldarico Muico (um_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-17 01:53:08


Hi. I noticed that matrix arguments for the blas functions like gemm
are no longer const-correct as they were in numeric_bindings-v1. Is
this intentional, or am I missing something?