Re: [ublas] [bindings] const-correctness

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] const-correctness
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-17 03:51:19

Uldarico Muico wrote:

> Hi.  I noticed that matrix arguments for the blas functions like gemm
> are no longer const-correct as they were in numeric_bindings-v1.  Is
> this intentional, or am I missing something?

You're right. I've modified the generator a bit, and committed the result to 
svn. All BLAS bindings should be const-correct now. Please let me know if it 
works for you.

Cheers,

Rutger