Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] const-correctness
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-17 03:51:19
Uldarico Muico wrote:
> Hi. I noticed that matrix arguments for the blas functions like gemm
> are no longer const-correct as they were in numeric_bindings-v1. Is
> this intentional, or am I missing something?
You're right. I've modified the generator a bit, and committed the result to
svn. All BLAS bindings should be const-correct now. Please let me know if it
works for you.