Re: [ublas] Anybody still there?

Subject: Re: [ublas] Anybody still there?
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-01 10:29:04

There has been a few changes and documentation written in fact. A few new
algorithms has been added like the assignment operators.

It is actively maintained even if in it's current state there is not a lot
to do.
In fact, I'm seriously thinking at ...

<flame wars>
- changing the core library to make it able to be faster, introduce new
algorithms, and auto-vectorization

- removing the vector class in favor of a unique matrix class (and vector
would simply be a one-column matrix). That would allow us to simply
represent column and row vector and unify the computation engine

- be faster than eigen and armadillo: ok that one is gonna be pretty hard
:-D
</flame wars>

Meanwhile, I'm slowly improving little things... Fortunately, I have been
using ublas for my job for the last few years.
But for sure, it needs more love.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:15, Sean Reilly <campreilly_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm using uBLAS for a big project, and just wanted to see if it is
> still being actively maintained.  It doesn't seem like there have been
> many changes in the last few years.
>
> Sean Reilly
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: david.bellot_at_[hidden]
>