Subject: Re: [ublas] Ublas move semantics
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-27 10:13:47
there is definitely a thought of adding c++11 move semantics in uBLAS,
but because at the moment there are ways around it, it is not considered
an immediate priority. Adding said support is a fairly trivial task that
needs though a careful design. If someone thinks he can do it for say
one or more basic classes, I think it would immediately be acceptable
into uBlas. A good start would be the design of relevant std::vector
move semantic implementations that can be found around the web.
On 07/27/2013 04:34 AM, gsermaid wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am aware of the BOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS, but I think I cannot use
> that in order to create my own move constructors in my own classes.
> Does ublas support rvalue references and if not, are there any plans
> for this?
> ublas mailing list
> Sent to: athanasios.iliopoulos.ctr.gr_at_[hidden]