Re: [ublas] Ublas move semantics

Subject: Re: [ublas] Ublas move semantics
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-27 10:13:47

Giorgo,
there is definitely a thought of adding c++11 move semantics in uBLAS, 
but because at the moment there are ways around it, it is not considered 
an immediate priority. Adding said support is a fairly trivial task that 
needs though a careful design. If someone thinks he can do it for say 
one or more basic classes, I think it would immediately be acceptable 
into uBlas. A good start would be the design of relevant std::vector 
move semantic implementations that can be found around the web.

-Nasos

On 07/27/2013 04:34 AM, gsermaid wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am aware of the BOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS, but I think I cannot use 
> that in order to create my own move constructors in my own classes. 
> Does ublas support rvalue references and if not, are there any plans 
> for this?
>
> Thanks,
> Giorgos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: athanasios.iliopoulos.ctr.gr_at_[hidden]