|
|
Ublas : |
Subject: Re: [ublas] ublas status for 1.56
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-29 08:51:53
Matt,
this is the state of develop:
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/numeric-ublas.html
I did an effort in the spring to clean up the the tests. As you can see
the develop branch is pretty much done and there are no issues on intel
and gcc compilers and hardly a few on mingw. clang should be ok with
some exceptions that seem to fail without reason on darwin (on linux all
clan compilers compile without failures).
What remains is probably not worth the time and in many cases it is
because of issues with other boost libraries. See for example:
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/BP%20x86_64%20C++11-boost-bin-v2-libs-numeric-ublas-test-comp_mat_erase-test-clang-linux-3-5~c14_libc++-debug-debug-symbols-off.html
I still have to upload a checked_iterator fix for MSVC to clean some
more tests. Unfortunately though with MSVC I am not sure if we will be
able to go all green because of certain intricacies with mapped containers.
I think David plans to incorporate those changes in the next release.
-Nasos
On 07/28/2014 06:07 PM, Matthew Musto wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I understand that ublas development did not align with the 1.56
> release cycle and instead you are focused on making 1.57 a solid release.
>
> I was curious if I could get an estimate of when the development
> branch of boost would have a version of ublas which passes all of the
> regression tests. Also, once that is the case, would I be able to
> merge the ublas directory into my existing 1.56 local copy?
>
> Thanks much,
> -Matt
>
> --
> --------------------
> Matthew Musto
> matthew.musto_at_[hidden] <mailto:matthew.musto_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: athanasios.iliopoulos.ctr.gr_at_[hidden]