Re: [boost] Any interest for stack_trace?

From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-20 13:38:39

We discussed a couple of years back code to do tracebacks that did not
require instrumenting, which IMO is much more interesting.

On linux/glibc, there is a function 'backtrace' that can help (libc manual,
sec 33.1).  We did talk about some code.  Discussion bogged down on
demangling symbols.  At the time, the demangling code was not free (IIRC),
but I think that is no longer a problem.