Re: [boost] Any interest for stack_trace?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-20 13:55:17

Neal Becker wrote:
> We discussed a couple of years back code to do tracebacks that did not
> require instrumenting, which IMO is much more interesting.
> 
> On linux/glibc, there is a function 'backtrace' that can help (libc manual,
> sec 33.1).  We did talk about some code.  Discussion bogged down on
> demangling symbols.  At the time, the demangling code was not free (IIRC),
> but I think that is no longer a problem.
> 

There's some code from long ago as well:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/StackTraces/

Jeff