Re: [boost] [rfc] Quadrature library for numerical integrationofdefinite integrals

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-07 03:51:10

Hugo Duncan wrote:
> One of the questions I pondered was whether I should use
> Boost.Parameter 
> or not.  In the end I opted to use it, and I think it works well. 
> Using thirteen parameters does however slow the compiler quite
> significantly. 
> There is also a slight clash with the Math toolkit library in the
> vault, 
> in that it unconditionaly defines BOOST_PARAMETER_MAX_ARITY to a
> smaller value.

That define has been removed from the Math Toolkit code in SVN.

> BTW, just noticed that math toolkit is in SVN - will it be in the next
> boost release?

Yep :-)

John.