Re: A Follow Up to My Original Note Re The Future of Boost

From: Matt Borland (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-08-01 13:55:37

> Thank you, and this is very much in the Boost tradition. While the Boost
> Software License is likely to be the project's most impactful contribution,
> the Formal Review Process is a close second. Therefore, I propose that the
> question of custodianship be decided by a formal review.
> 

> It is becoming more and more difficult to find suitable review managers who
> are not associated with the C++ Alliance (a self-inflicted wound, I
> suppose) but I nominate these as candidates:
> 

> Ion Gaztanaga
> John Maddock
> 

I endorse the review; since we have a system in place to make these kinds of decisions we may as well use it.

Matt