|
Boost Users : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-05 18:24:18
"Robert Mathews" <rmathews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:d2v27d$m9p$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> That'd be nice. I'm looking at using boost.test for some of my
> application-specific unit tests, but these kinds of practical issues get
> in
> the way, to wit:
> - passing test configuration
Will you be willing to comply to Boost.Test format or adopt your format to
Boost.Test interfaces?
> - listing the tests contained in the unit test (so that I can compare the
> tests run against the total number of tests available - hard to know how
> much coverage you're getting if you don't know what's in the .exe)
I am not sure how list of tests help you here: are you planning to run test
cases by name and want to see what persentage of tests you run?
> - "expected failure" feature
Boost.Test does provide "expected failure" feature for explicit test case
registration
> - the ability to generate a better error message - ie, include a bit of
> text
> about what the test was about.
Why BOOST_..._MESSAGE doesn't work for you? You could also use BOOST_MESSAGE
for standalone mesage in test log
> Cheers,
> Rob.
Gennadiy
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net