[boost] Re: result of compose discussion

From: Nicolai Josuttis (nicolai.josuttis_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 06:44:33

Nathan Myers wrote:
> 
> 
> "Nonary" is abominable, but should remain as a goad until somebody
> comes up with a good reason to favor one among the others.  What's
> wrong with "nonary"?  First, it implies nine arguments.
> 
> Of the suggestions I have seen, niladic or nullary seem best.
> 
OK, I have switched to nullary (until ...)

-- 
Nicolai M. Josuttis
Solutions in Time
http://www.josuttis.de/
mailto:solutions_at_[hidden]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications