[boost] Re: result of compose discussion

From: Andy Glew (glew_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 10:42:18

>For the question of "nonary_function" "nullary_function",
>"niladic_function", "voidary_function", ...
>it seems we get more and more suggestions.
>So, for the moment I stay with "nonary_function".

Sigh. "nonary" means 9-ary.

Why not say "function_0ary",
"function_1ary",
"function_2ary"
etc.

I.e. use numbers in the names?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications