Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andy Glew (glew_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 10:42:18

>For the question of "nonary_function" "nullary_function",
>"niladic_function", "voidary_function", ...
>it seems we get more and more suggestions.
>So, for the moment I stay with "nonary_function".

Sigh. "nonary" means 9-ary.

Why not say "function_0ary",

I.e. use numbers in the names?

------------------------------------------------------------------------ home: - Simplifying group communications

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at