From: Miki Jovanovic (miki_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-01 10:30:52
boris fomitchev <fb-_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> What I was speaking of was actually "faster shared ptr"
> implementation by Dave Abrahams - it has same size as the original one
> and no other penalties compared to it.
That would explain it :-). Nothing like a juicy misunderstanding.
> To fight new(), shared_ptr may use allocator<T> (if they happy to
> or use Dave's implementation. I think the latter is better.
Hmm, I will examine the implementation of these allocators. I was
earlier convinced that they are definitely beneficial for optimising
speed critical segments. I am curious, what are the disadvantages of
using allocators extensively, for as many of classes as possible.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk