From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-17 08:10:22
on 3/17/00 4:10 AM, Kevlin Henney at kevlin_at_[hidden] wrote:
> It seems that one of the most common requests concerning the standard
> headers is whether there are forward declaring headers for <string>,
> <vector>, etc as there is for <ios>.
> What does the list think about establishing this as a practice for Boost
> headers? Setting a precedent by defining headers with significant
> template content and/or dependencies to have a <*fwd> counterpart?
We don't currently prohibit users from writing their own forward
declarations, and I see no reason we should. Let's save ourselves some
trouble and not fix what ain't broke.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk