Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-04-20 23:27:56

on 4/20/00 9:23 PM, Howard Hinnant at hinnant_at_[hidden] wrote:

> Admittedly "constant complexity" does not necessarily equal "efficient",
> but it is close enough for my money.

Okay, I buy that.

So, to be accurate:
swap is only guaranteed to be non-throwing and efficient when used on the
standard containers (and standard container iterators, since no iterator
operation is allowed to throw).


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at