From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-04-27 08:07:14
At 12:30 PM 4/26/00 -0500, jsiek_at_[hidden] wrote:
>In the Boost FAQ is listed a few types of things that disqualify a
>license from being "boost compatible", but it seems to me the
>characterization there is somewhat vague and incomplete. I would
>to see a better description of what qualities a license must have,
>and the qualities it must not have, to be boost compatible .
Would you like to propose some improved wording?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk