From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-07 18:34:01
At 02:32 PM 5/7/00 -0500, jsiek_at_[hidden] wrote:
>Here's a proposal for the requirements for boost compatible
>1. Must grant permission to copy, use and modify the software
> for any use (commercial and non-commercial) for no fee.
>2. Must require that the license appear on all copies of the
>3. May not require that the license appear with executables, etc.
> that use the library and may not require that the source code
> also be available.
I'm with you so far.
>4. May contain restrictions about what is considered the
> "Standard Version" of the library. The version available
> at the boost cite would be the "Standard Version".
> (similar to clauses in the artistic license)
I'm not sure I understand this one. I tried the Perl version of the
artistic license, failed to parse it after two reading and gave up.
Could you explain in a bit more detail? Sorry I'm so dense.
Thanks for following up on this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk