RE: [boost] boost license compatibility

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-05-08 12:47:07

Hibbs, Philip writes:
 > >3. May not require that the license appear with executables, 
 > > etc. that use the library and may not require that the source 
 > > code also be available.
 > 
 > What do you mean by "may not require"? This can be read two distinctly
 > different ways. Does it mean "Is not allowed to require" or "Is allowed not to
 > require"?

I meant "Is not allowed to require".

Cheers,

Jeremy