RE: [boost] boost license compatibility

From: Hibbs, Philip (philip.hibbs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-09 02:58:33

>I meant "Is not allowed to require".

I would have guessed that, but you went from saying "must require" to "may not
require" - why not say "must not require"?

Philip Hibbs http://www.snark.freeserve.co.uk/
Opinions expressed may not even be my own, let 
alone those of any organisations, nations, species, 
or schools of thought to which I may be affiliated.