From: Hibbs, Philip (philip.hibbs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-08 02:56:21
>3. May not require that the license appear with executables,
> etc. that use the library and may not require that the source
> code also be available.
What do you mean by "may not require"? This can be read two distinctly
different ways. Does it mean "Is not allowed to require" or "Is allowed not to
Philip Hibbs http://www.snark.freeserve.co.uk/
Opinions expressed may not even be my own, let
alone those of any organisations, nations, species,
or schools of thought to which I may be affiliated.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk