[boost] Re: reverse_iterator.hpp uploaded

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-14 23:10:14

Ahh, I see what you mean now. Well, I've uploaded a new version that
implements that anyways... it was a bit complicated, though I
simplified other parts of the implementation quite a bit.  If you
think the overall affect is still to complicated, we can still yank
out the inheritance deduction part.

Cheers,

Jeremy

Dave Abrahams writes:
 > --- In boost_at_[hidden], jsiek_at_l... wrote:
 > > David Abrahams writes:
 > >  > Sheesh. No offense, but that sounds more complicated than it's 
 > worth.
 > >  > If someone needs extended categorization they can define an
 > >  > extended_iterator_tag, no?
 > > 
 > > If I understand what you mean, that's what I'm trying to
 > > accommodate... the "my_iterator_tag" was one of these extended
 > > categories, and I need too be able to figure out which of the 
 > standard
 > > categories is its base class, so I can pick the right adaptor class
 > > for it.
 > > 
 > > I agree, things are getting a bit complicated :) I've got some ideas
 > > for how to simplify the code...
 > 
 > Sorry, I should have been clearer. I meant they could define a 
 > typedef extended_iterator_category *in addition* to the standard 
 > typedef iterator_category. I'm not sure the standard algorithms are 
 > guaranteed to work if the iterator_category is something other than 
 > one of the standard tags anyway.
 > 
 > -Dave
 > 
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Make new friends, find the old at Classmates.com:
 > http://click.egroups.com/1/5530/3/_/9351/_/961023360/
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 >