From: John E. Potter (jpotter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-17 08:25:42
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Mark Rodgers wrote:
> > My second point is unrelated to the rational for functional.hpp - so
> > consider it entirely optional - can we have an "identity" unary function
> > object. The SGI STL already has this, but it's not part of the standard,
> > my reason for bringing this up is that functional.hpp is the obvious
> > place to put this.
> I definitely think that a boost::identity is a good idea. If folks think
> functional.hpp is the appropriate place, I'm more than happy to include
> it. And what about project1st/project2nd and select1st/select2nd?
Yes to all! Is that std::identity or boost::identity? The latter is
much better. It's too easy to get SGIi[sz]ed. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk