From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-20 16:25:58
--- In boost_at_[hidden], "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_c...> wrote:
> Which leads me to the next question: should I have followed
> call_traits's lead and made functional.hpp compile with MSVC even
> though the result is little or no better than the standard
Call traits is a special case. If you know how to use it "just so",
you can write portable code which works even with broken compilers,
but is more efficient with less-broken compilers. If functional.hpp
can be used that way, I'd encourage you to make it possible.
Otherwise, maybe there's no point.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk