From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-05 16:56:20
Ed Brey wrote:
>From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
>> OK then, what do you think of a boost/algorithm.hpp that looks
>> like this:
>Your implementation goes as far as is possible, and I think will work
>nicely. I have two remaining, small suggestions:
>1. Name it boost/detail/algorithm.hpp, since this is not a library we
>directly to the end user. I see the purpose of this file as making it
>to write boost code that relies on functions and members with the name
>and max, whereas providing a workarounds to API header file snafus for
>own sake is beyond the scope of boost. Of course, if an end user wants
>make use of the file for a non-boost-related reason, that is fine, but
>he is "digging into the details".
>Of course, by this logic, shouldn't config.hpp be under detail, also?
config.hpp pre-dated detail, so we never talked about where it should go.
Yes, it does seem like detail is where it should go. Hum...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk