Re: [boost] Smart Pointer Feature Model

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-07-17 19:40:14

meta_if sounds good to me too.

Kevlin Henney writes:
 > In message <01a401bfedcf$ed449050$37781990_at_[hidden]>, Greg Colvin
 > <greg_at_[hidden]> writes
 > >From: Beman Dawes <beman_at_[hidden]>
 > >> 
 > >> By the way, I agree the names just have to be changed or there will be 
 > >> constant fear of macro clashes.  ct_ seems cryptic; how about meta_ as in 
 > >> meta_if ?  But I'd get used to ct_if I suppose.
 > >
 > >Of course the simple IF form gives more readable code.
 > 
 > But is also a macro-style name :-(
 > 
 > I've got to admit that I'm partial to Beman's suggestion of meta_* for
 > the constructs, as this hints more than a little strongly at "template
 > metaprogramming".