Re: [boost] Smart Pointer Feature Model

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-07-18 11:53:45

I think the convention started in boost/type_traits.hpp is a good one,
that is, use "type" for when the result is a type, and "value" for
when it is a compile-time constant.

Cheers,

Jeremy

Beman Dawes writes:
 > Jeremy wrote:
 > 
 >  >meta_if sounds good to me too.
 > 
 > Also think about the name for the result.  RET (short for RETURN) isn't at 
 > all clear or helpful.  The result really isn't a returned value in the 
 > normal sense.  The result is a type.
 > 
 > So how about either type or meta_type?  Just plain type sounds best to my 
 > inner ear.
 > 
 > --Beman
 > 
 > PS:  The header we are talking about can be found at 
 > http://www.prakinf.tu-ilmenau.de/~czarn/meta/metactrl
 > 
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Life's too short to send boring email. Let SuperSig come to the rescue.
 > http://click.egroups.com/1/6809/4/_/9351/_/963924242/
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 >