From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-05 15:10:46
Problem with that is that you end up reserving the names lambda, etc. in
What about boost::detail::lambda, etc.?
Reserving a namespace name in detail is much less impactful (is that a
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] namespace "details"
> > Now that there are several boost libraries which have "details"
> > should we be using a namespace with less possible collisions? i.e.
> > ggcl_details? any_details?, lambda_details? vtl_details?
> How about boost::lambda::detail, etc?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk