Boost logo

Boost :

From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-07 07:30:00

        Why be vague? namespace boost::internal_use_only.

     James Curran

-----Original Message-----
Message: 8
   Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:40:54 -0700
   From: Gary Powell <Gary.Powell_at_[hidden]>
Subject: namespace "details"

Now that there are several boost libraries which have "details" namespaces
should we be using a namespace with less possible collisions? i.e.
ggcl_details? any_details?, lambda_details? vtl_details?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at