RE:namespace "details"

From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-07 07:30:00

        Why be vague?  namespace boost::internal_use_only.

    Truth, 
     James Curran

-----Original Message-----
Message: 8
   Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:40:54 -0700 
   From: Gary Powell <Gary.Powell_at_[hidden]>
Subject: namespace "details"

Now that there are several boost libraries which have "details" namespaces
should we be using a namespace with less possible collisions? i.e.
ggcl_details? any_details?, lambda_details? vtl_details?