RE: namespace "details"

From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-07 07:33:58

        Eek!

        Ahem... How 'bout "effective", "effectual", "consequential", "far-reaching"
or "grave".

     James Curran

-----Original Message-----
Message: 11
   Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:10:46 -0400
   From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: namespace "details"

Problem with that is that you end up reserving the names lambda, etc. in
boost.
What about boost::detail::lambda, etc.?
Reserving a namespace name in detail is much less impactful (is that a
word?)