From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-29 16:30:07
At 10:44 AM 11/29/2000 -0800, Gary Powell wrote:
> This is cute, but I won't be using it anytime soon in production code.
>Reasons are that being non standard code its going to confuse the junior
>members of the staff. Also if I'm not mistaken because of the
>it might not do things as I would expect.
Seems to me I've seen this discussion before (although not on boost) and
the conclusion was the same as Gary's above.
I don't know if it would be worth coming up with a named function which did
arg1 < arg2 < arg3. That might eliminate some of the issues.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk