From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-09 15:24:28
> If it's
> beneficial to have the exact type reported then it seems that there
> needs to be a way to specify types that will be caught. Otherwise
> libraries that extend this heirarchy with their own exception types
> will be reported as generic exception types while the standard
> exception types that extend the heirarchy are more precise. I'd be
> in favor of just catching std::exception types instead.
Unfortunately, there are environments where some standard
exceptions don't have useful what() strings, e.g. bad_alloc()
on some platforms.
This is unlikely with user-defined exceptions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk