Re: [boost] Lambda on MSVC

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-19 17:38:40

So it should be left_value and right_value then?

From: David Abrahams <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> ...or lvalue() and rvalue(). I like lvalue() better than var() du to my
> hatrd of abbrevs.
> -Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [boost] Lambda on MSVC
> 
> 
> > At 01:07 PM 3/19/2001, Gary Powell wrote:
> >
> >  >> PS: Gary, do you insist on var() and constant()? Don't lv() and rv()
> >  >sound
> >  >> better? :-)
> >  ><<
> >  >No I don't insist. The reason for the more verbose names is my
> experience
> >
> >  >is
> >  >that code is read 6 times for every time its re-written. Hence
> > readability
> >  >(I'm showing my English bias) is very important, both for maintenance
> and
> >  >for debugging. But I could be convinced otherwise. Anyone else have an
> >  >opinion on this?
> >
> > To me, var() and constant() seem ever so much more readable.
> >
> > --Beman
> >
> >
> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>