Re: [boost] Build system/GCC questions

From: John Max Skaller (skaller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-06 13:43:31

David Abrahams wrote:
 
> Agitating for an approach that has already been discussed and rejected (see
> this thread: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/7559) is not
> productive unless you address the reasons for rejection.

        I'm  not 'agitating' for anything. I simply wrote a
one line message, hoping people would rethink their own
logic, after seeing quite a few messages concerning 
configuring 'Jam' (which I don't have).

-- 
John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller_at_[hidden]
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net
download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net