From: Kloss, Burkhard (Burkhard.Kloss_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 05:22:28
>There was no conclusion (will there ever be?).
>Currently indexing is 1-based, and there's an upcoming article about
>tuples in CUJ, which describes them as 1-base indexed.
>However, this doesn't prevent taking the other alternative,
>if that is considered better.
>So those who feel strongly about this issue, speak up now and we'll
>change to 0-based. Otherwise, I'd suggest leaving it as it is.
Just to cast my vote - 0 based indexing is far more consistent with other
indexing in C++ - I would find 1 based indexing terribly confusing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk