RE: [boost] Re: Tuple library accepted

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 14:35:47

 >[David Abrahams]
 >I think the arguments for interoperability of zero-based indexing are
 >compelling. All the same, is there any reason we can't have both 
zero-based
 >indexing and '_1st', '_2nd', etc. as suggested below?

I also vote for 0-based indexing but 1-based naming (_1st, _2nd, _3rd, 
...).

--Beman