From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-19 14:53:32
At 01:07 PM 7/19/2001, Thomas Matelich wrote:
>This brings up the issue of warnings. I realize we don't want to reject
>code based on warnings, but maybe the regression tests could start
>making files to show compiler output for the tests. I wouldn't put
>those in CVS necessarily, but often warnings from one compiler will be
>errors on another, so having access to those will make
>maintenance/upgrading a little nicer.
The compiler logs are available at
There is a link to each of the logs on
http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html See the "[compiler
messages]" entry for each compiler.
Perhaps that isn't clear because it is right next to the link for the
table, and the two links blend together.
Should we move "[compiler messages]" to the end of the lines?
And yes, there are some warnings in the logs that it wouldn't hurt to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk