|
Boost : |
From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-25 20:45:30
The following changes to shared_ptr might still be controversial:
// Namespace std:: definitions removed (Peter Dimov)
//
// Rationale:
//
// std::swap() overloads are illegal (17.4.3.1/1, LWG issue #226)
//
// std::less<> specializations that do not call operator< are illegal
// (17.4.3.1/1, 20.3.3/5)
//
// std::less cannot be partially specialized on compilers that do not
// support the feature
//
// std::less specializations do not help in cases like
// map<pair<shared_ptr, int>, int>
I'm too tired of the whole problem to have a strong opinion any
more, and having shared_ptr::operator< doesn't seem nearly
as evil as the core and library issues that specializing std::less
stumbles into.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk