Re: [boost] review requiest: config_06.zip

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-08 06:25:07

>But I don't know what to do.  It seems wrong to make those on compliant 
>platforms define BOOST_TOTALLY_COMPLIANT or similar.

Exactly, if there was a portable #warn directive then I would say use that
- but I don't think that this should be an error - for many boost libraries
with reasonably conformant compilers no macros need be set (smart_ptr for
example), and there is at least a means of testing the boost configuration
now.

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/