From: Gabriel Dos Reis (Gabriel.Dos-Reis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-20 12:28:56
Dietmar Kuehl <dietmar_kuehl_at_[hidden]> writes:
| Helmut Zeisel wrote:
| > However, if we wait for a matrix library that covers
| > all these issues, we will never have a standard C++ matrix interface.
| You don't want to define a matrix class anyway! You want to define
| a generic interface for matrices which is used to access some
I couldn't agree more.
One should take in separating algorithms from storage
layout/management. A matrix-library should specify a generic interface
(concept requirements, call it what you like).
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk