From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-29 15:09:53
> I think this argument would be more compelling if there was a way to know
> that a change in version meant "major release". But currently, any time a
> compiler vendor makes a minor release that bumps the version number, we
> run into this "optimism" and have to rev. Boost.
True, but sometimes major features are addressed in a minor release.
For example, Borland fixed void returns with patch 1 to C++Builder 4!
And anyway, the workaround could well be due to a simple bug that has
indeed been fixed by the patch.
So I still think we should be "optimistic" for the sake of knowing
exactly when are optimism is misplaced.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk