Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy E. Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-16 09:55:08

We should probably now substitute BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T to
BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG in some places where it guards tests with long
long (in type traits for example)


--- In boost_at_y..., John Maddock <John_Maddock_at_c...> wrote:
> >I would also need a macro telling whether long long is available.
> I think it is better to see the definition in a single place
> than to see the same test repeated in many headers.
> Whether this single definition is provided in config.hpp,
> in some other header,
> or in a new header for just that purpose
> is less important to me.
> <
> OK, done it's called BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG.
> - John Maddock

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at