From: Gennadiy E. Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-17 12:07:46
Also numeric_test_traits using ULLONG_MAX to identify presence of
long long. This couse, for example, this test to fail with Sun forte
C++ u.2 compiler due to unclear reasons in static aaserts statements
in lines 313-314.
--- In boost_at_y..., "Gennadiy E. Rozental" <rogeeff_at_m...> wrote:
> We should probably now substitute BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T to
> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG in some places where it guards tests with long
> long (in type traits for example)
> --- In boost_at_y..., John Maddock <John_Maddock_at_c...> wrote:
> > >I would also need a macro telling whether long long is available.
> > I think it is better to see the definition in a single place
> > than to see the same test repeated in many headers.
> > Whether this single definition is provided in config.hpp,
> > in some other header,
> > or in a new header for just that purpose
> > is less important to me.
> > <
> > OK, done it's called BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG.
> > - John Maddock
> > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk