Re: config request

From: Gennadiy E. Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-17 12:07:46

Also numeric_test_traits using ULLONG_MAX to identify presence of 
long long. This couse, for example, this test to fail with Sun forte 
C++ u.2 compiler due to unclear reasons in static aaserts statements 
in lines 313-314.

Gennadiy.

--- In boost_at_y..., "Gennadiy E. Rozental" <rogeeff_at_m...> wrote:
> We should probably now substitute BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T to 
> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG in some places where it guards tests with long 
> long (in type traits for example)
> 
> Gennadiy.
> 
> 
> --- In boost_at_y..., John Maddock <John_Maddock_at_c...> wrote:
> > 
> > >I would also need a macro telling whether long long is available.
> > I think it is better to see the definition in a single place
> > than to see the same test repeated in many headers.
> > Whether this single definition is provided in config.hpp,
> > in some other header,
> > or in a new header for just that purpose
> > is less important to me.
> > <
> > 
> > OK, done it's called BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG.
> > 
> > - John Maddock
> > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/