From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-02 17:30:06
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_[hidden]>
> I hate wading into a religious war, so I'll just say I take a dim view of
> almost all general arguments about the "correct" way to use C++ language
> features in a design...
Me, too. That's why I asked the posters in question to take the discussion
off-list. I'm only mentioning this because I wouldn't want the beginning of
Greg's post to encourage a return to discussion of the less-substantive
details. Please do discuss iterator ranges some more, though!
In that spirit, I think talking about iterator ranges misses a significant
opportunity for generalization. My half_open_range works with integer types
as well as iterators. I'm not sure there's anything special about iterator
ranges as opposed to ranges of other things.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk