Re: [boost] Re: iterator ranges; eliminating private member functions

From: Kevin S. Van Horn (kevin.vanhorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-02 18:20:06

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, David Abrahams wrote:

> In that spirit, I think talking about iterator ranges misses a significant
> opportunity for generalization. My half_open_range works with integer types
> as well as iterators. I'm not sure there's anything special about iterator
> ranges as opposed to ranges of other things.

Is half_open_range documented somewhere, or is it not officially released?
I see it in the sources, but I couldn't find a description of it.